Electrical permit history — 711 S 6th Av
711 S 6th Av, Tucson — built 1983, with 11 permits on record. Review electrical, HVAC and remodel history with links to official records.
Commercial property
711 S 6th Av
Built 1983 — 1980s commercial stock · last permitted panel/service work 2025 (finaled)
Permanent link: Electrical permit history for 711 S 6th Av (aztucsonelectricalsolutions.com/property/11707216a/711-s-6th-av-tucson-az-85701) · Public records last checked 2026-08-17
- Parcel
- 11707216A
- Built
- 1983 (county record)
- Jurisdiction
- Tucson
- Zoning
- HC-3
- Assessor use
- Store Front Commercial Bldg
- Parcel size
- 0.42 acres
- Building area
- 3,959 sq ft (assessor record)
- Sewer
- Connection on file (1964, 1969) (county sewer connection records)
- Flood zone
- X — minimal flood hazard (FEMA)
- Historic preservation
- Armory Park Historic Residential District — Historic Preservation Zone (City of Tucson)
- Service on record
- City records show the 2025 permit was finalized; the permit description states “Gutting out existing electrical service and relocate new electrical service to a better accessible location.”.
See the property
Pima County orthophoto (Pictometry 2024 / PAG 2023 / NAIP 2023 mosaic) — parcel outlined in yellow. Aerials can predate recent work and show nothing about what is inside; context, not evidence.
Is it time to upgrade?
- Electrical service & distributionCurrentLast permitted 2025 (1 year ago). Worth reading the permit itself: it names the service but does not read as an increase in capacity, so this may have been a like-for-like replacement rather than an upgrade. Separately from replacement: NFPA 70E expects the arc-flash study to be reviewed at least every five years, or after any change to the service. SD-0825-00130 — Gutting out existing electrical service and relocate new electrical service to a better accessible location.
- Heating, cooling & mechanicalNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Worth knowing: a 2001 addition / alteration permit is on file — work like this is often folded into a larger permit without being named, so open that record and check its scope before concluding anything. Packaged rooftop units work harder in Tucson than almost anywhere, so 12 to 15 years is a realistic service life rather than the 15 to 20 the industry quotes. Worth confirming from the equipment nameplate rather than the record. Replacing a rooftop unit is also an electrical question: the new unit's minimum circuit ampacity and its disconnect often differ from the old one.
- Fire alarm & life safetyNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Any alarm or sprinkler work here predates this feed. For an occupied commercial building that is worth confirming from the panel and the inspection tags rather than assuming.
- RoofNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Roof age matters electrically too: it sets what can be penetrated for new rooftop units, conduit, or solar.
A found permit means a lot. A missing one means less. We read the City of Tucson’s own permit file, not a recent extract of it — back to about 2006, and into the 1990s on properties with that much history. Microfiche before then was never fully digitised. Every record links to the city’s official file. A blank line does not say nothing was done: work gets done without permits all the time. The only way to know what is actually installed is to look at it.
What that usually means electrically
- Era-based check — high priority
Distribution gear this age is frequently past the point where the manufacturer still supports it. Breakers and fusible switches for obsolete lines can carry long lead times, which turns an outage into a shutdown. The permit record does not confirm this; an on-site inspection is required.
- Era-based check
NFPA 70E expects arc-flash studies to be reviewed at least every five years, or after any change to the service. Buildings this age often have labeling that no longer matches the installed gear. The permit record does not confirm this; an on-site inspection is required.
Recorded sales (1)
| Date | Price | Type |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-04-01 | $995,000 | Warranty Deed |
Recorded sales are the sales the Pima County Assessor has on file from affidavits of property value — not every transfer, not listings, and not a valuation. Parties are never shown here. A sale with no permitted electrical work since is worth knowing before the next sale or a remodel.
Most recent permit on record for this parcel: 2026-06-16 (TD-DEV-0626-00154) — Classroom and Storage Additions.
Permit history (11)
| Date | Record | What | Status | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-16 | TD-DEV-0626-00154City permit record | Addition / alterationClassroom and Storage Additions | In review | |
| 2026-04-02 | TC-COM-0426-00462City permit record | Commercial BuildingAdd a work room, office and storage/receiving area. | In review | |
| 2025-08-14finaled 2025-09-15 | SD-0825-00130Design review | Historic Preservation Zone/Historic LandmarkGutting out existing electrical service and relocate new electrical service to a better accessible location. | Complete | |
| 2025-06-23expired 2026-04-29 | TC-COM-0625-01198City permit record | Commercial BuildingGutting out existing electrical service and relocate new electrical service to a better accessible location. | Inspections | |
| 2017-11-15finaled | T17RW05087City permit record | ROW4 X 4 SQUARE FOR SEWER REPAIR ON ARIZONA ST AND 17TH BACK EASEMENT OF ALLEY | Final | |
| 2017-09-01finaled | T17RW03916City permit record | ROWREPAIR OF 5 PANELS ON SIDEWALK | Final | |
| 2009-06-16 | C10-01-54City permit record | Zoning Verification LetterC10-01-54 PHILABAUM GLASS - - No | Submitted | |
| 2009-01-27 | C10-02-31City permit record | Pool / spaC10-02-31 PHILABAUM GLASS The applicant's property is an 18,292 square foot site developed with an existing glass gallery and general manufacturing business. The applicant has enclosed structures and/or expanded the building creating an expansion of the building greater than twenty-five (25) percent. Due to the amount of expansion on the site, the applicant is required to meet all current Land Use Code requirements relating to pedestrian access, motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces, loading spaces, landscaping and screening. The applicant is requesting the following variances to allow the property to remain as currently developed; 1) Reduce the width of the on-site pedestrian access to the entrance at the rear of the building from five (5) feet to four (4) feet; 2) Delete six (6) of the twenty-seven (27) on-site parking spaces required for the existing retail/manufacturing use on the site; 3) Reduce the length of the on-site parking spaces from eighteen (18) feet long to a minimum of fifteen feet six inches (15'-6"); 4) Reduce the size of parallel parking spaces from eight (8) feet wide by twenty-three (23) feet long to nine feet, six inches (9'-6") wide and a minimum of seventeen feet, one inch (17'-1") long; 5) Reduce the width of the two-way parking area access lane (PAAL) from twenty-four (24) feet to a minimum of twelve (12) feet; 6) Delete the loading space for the existing use on the site; 7) Delete the street landscape border along Sixth Avenue; 8) Delete the thirty (30) inch high screen required on the development side of the landscape buffer along Sixth Avenue; 9) Allow the project to provide the landscaping and screening as indicated on the applicant's site plan. DECISION: VARIANCES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9: GRANTED WITH CONDITIONS. A. The three existing sheds located in the southeast corner of the site be removed. B. Improvements provided per that site plan with the revision date of October 5, 2001and submitted to the Board at the August 28, 2002 public hearing. The improvements to include the landscaping and screening now existing on the site. C. [Specific to that portion of the site's drive and parking area running along the approximate 185 linear feet of north lot line paved with asphalt and bounded by chain link fence with living vines] the asphalt is to be cut back (12") from the fence so as to provide a permanent breathable area (root zone) for the vines. | Closed |
Show 3 older records
| Date | Record | What | Status | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-01-26 | C10-02-21City permit record | Fence / wallC10-02-21 HAYWOOD/PHILABAUM GLASS The applicant (Sloane Haywood) is appealing the Zoning Administrators determination, dated March 18, 2002, that the site plan approved by the City in 1985 for the Philabaum Glass facility is to be used as the base plan in which to calculate future expansions made to the facility, and that fenced off outdoor area indicated on the plan is to be included in the facility's base gross floor area for expansion purposes. The appellant is appealing the Zoning Administrators determination, dated March 18, 2002, regarding the Philabaum Glass facility. DECISION: THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S DETERMINATION, DATED MARCH 18, 2002, REGARDING THE PHILABAUM GLASS FACILITY BE UPHELD. | Closed | |
| 2001-07-10finaled | T01EL01788City permit record | ELECTREPAIR:ELECTRICAL + 4 NEW SUBPANELS | Final | |
| 2001-06-26finaled | T01CM03173City permit record | Addition / alterationADDITION:STORAGE | Final |
How to read the status column: Final / Complete / C of O — city records show the permit was finalized. Issued — the work was permitted, but final completion is not confirmed. Applied / In review / Approved / Fees paid — proposed, not completion. Expired — the permit expired without a confirmed final status. Void / Withdrawn / Canceled — not evidence the work was installed. Any other status is shown exactly as the issuing office records it, without a completion reading.
Code enforcement (2)
Code cases and housing-code violations recorded against this parcel, by category. Closed cases stay on the record, and most of these are closed — check the status column. We show the category and the official record number rather than the complaint text, which often names people who have nothing to do with the property.
| Date | Record | What | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-02-15finaled | T07FR00342Code enforcement case | Code enforcement case | Complete |
| 2001-06-21 | T01VL01781Code enforcement case | Code enforcement case | Closed |
Record numbers link to the City of Tucson’s official file. Highlighted rows are the ones that imply electrical work or an unpermitted-work finding.
This is an inference from public records — the year a structure was built, how it is classified, and what has been permitted. It is not an inspection, and nothing here confirms what is actually installed at this address. The only way to know is to look in the panel. See an error in this public-record report? Report a correction · About this data.
Planning work at this property?
Arizona Electrical Solutions provides electrical, HVAC, underground, design-build, tenant-improvement and general-contracting services in Tucson (four Arizona ROC licenses). Choose what describes you and send us this property’s address and public-record report for review — the address, parcel, report link and permit record travel with the request automatically.
The contractor’s read is a plain-English brief of the record above, written by AI — what it shows across electrical, mechanical and the building itself, what is missing for the era, and what to verify on site.
The permanent link and the summary above, sent once. No list.One email when a new permit, inspection result or code case appears on this parcel — nothing else, and you can stop any time. No list.
How this report was built
This is a reading of public records for parcel 11707216A — 11 permits on file from 2001 to 2026 (2 addition / alteration, 2 commercial building, 2 row, 1 historic preservation zone/historic landmark) and 2 code enforcement cases — assembled from the Pima County parcel file, the City of Tucson’s Property Research Online file (permits back to about 2006, further on some parcels), and the City’s GIS permit and code-enforcement layers (2022 onward). Public records last checked 2026-08-17; the record is re-read at least weekly. Each permit and code case links to its official file. The verdicts are inferences from what was permitted and when, and from the era the building went up; they are not an inspection, and nothing here confirms what is installed. A permit that is present is strong evidence; a permit that is absent is weak evidence — plenty of work is never permitted, and older county records were only partly moved online.
The interactive version of this report can also read the plan sheets behind a City of Tucson permit and write a contractor’s brief of the whole record — those buttons appear once the page finishes loading. Written and maintained by Arizona Electrical Solutions, LLC, a licensed Tucson contractor (ROC 276948 CR-11 electrical, ROC 326401 CR-39 HVAC, ROC 329360 KB-1, ROC 312437 KA).
Look up a different address: Tucson permit history & electrical upgrade check · see permit data by neighborhood.
