Electrical permit history — 8201 E Stella Rd

Commercial property

8201 E Stella Rd

Built 1980 — 1980s commercial stock · last permitted panel/service work 2011 (finaled); a newer 2011 permit is expired without a final

Permanent link: Electrical permit history for 8201 E Stella Rd (aztucsonelectricalsolutions.com/property/13618001c/8201-e-stella-rd-tucson-az-85730) · Public records last checked 2026-08-16

Parcel

13618001C

Built

1980 (county record)

Jurisdiction

Tucson

Zoning

RX-1

Assessor use

Municipal Park/Recreational Property

Parcel size

39.91 acres

Building area

1,800 sq ft (assessor record)

Sewer

No connection on file (sewer or septic status not confirmed by the record — verify on site)

Flood zone

X — minimal flood hazard (FEMA)

Historic preservation

Not on file (City of Tucson HP layers)

Service on record

City records show the 2011 permit was finalized; the permit description states “FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT REPLACE ELECTRICAL SERVICE, INSTALL TWO CONTROL CABINETS, REFEED EXISTING ELEC. SYSTEM, ADD LIGHTING FOR B-BALL COURT FOR CITY PARK”.

See the property

Pima County orthophoto (Pictometry 2024 / PAG 2023 / NAIP 2023 mosaic) — parcel outlined in yellow. Aerials can predate recent work and show nothing about what is inside; context, not evidence.

Street ViewGoogle Maps satelliteGoogle Earth (3D, historical imagery) ↗

Is it time to upgrade?

• Electrical service & distributionCurrentA newer 2011 permit for the same system is recorded as “Expired” — The permit expired without a confirmed final status. The permit description states “REPLACE ELECTRICAL SERVICE, INSTALL TWO CONTROL CABINETS, REFEED EXISTING ELEC. SYSTEM, ADD LIGHTING FOR B-BALL COURT FOR CITY PARK”. Last permitted 2011 (15 years ago). Contractor of record: SELLERS AND SONS INC, C***. Worth reading the permit itself: it names the service but does not read as an increase in capacity, so this may have been a like-for-like replacement rather than an upgrade. Separately from replacement: NFPA 70E expects the arc-flash study to be reviewed at least every five years, or after any change to the service. T11OT00355 — FLOODPLAIN USE PERMIT REPLACE ELECTRICAL SERVICE, INSTALL TWO CONTROL CABINETS, REFEED EXISTING ELEC. SYSTEM, ADD LIGHTING FOR B-BALL COURT FOR CITY PARK
• Heating, cooling & mechanicalNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Worth knowing: a 2024 commercial building permit is on file (and 1 more like it) — work like this is often folded into a larger permit without being named, so open that record and check its scope before concluding anything. Packaged rooftop units work harder in Tucson than almost anywhere, so 12 to 15 years is a realistic service life rather than the 15 to 20 the industry quotes. Worth confirming from the equipment nameplate rather than the record. Replacing a rooftop unit is also an electrical question: the new unit's minimum circuit ampacity and its disconnect often differ from the old one.
• Fire alarm & life safetyNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Any alarm or sprinkler work here predates this feed. For an occupied commercial building that is worth confirming from the panel and the inspection tags rather than assuming.
• RoofNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Roof age matters electrically too: it sets what can be penetrated for new rooftop units, conduit, or solar.

A found permit means a lot. A missing one means less. We read the City of Tucson’s own permit file, not a recent extract of it — back to about 2006, and into the 1990s on properties with that much history. Microfiche before then was never fully digitised. Every record links to the city’s official file. A blank line does not say nothing was done: work gets done without permits all the time. The only way to know what is actually installed is to look at it.

What that usually means electrically

• Era-based check — high priority

  Distribution gear this age is frequently past the point where the manufacturer still supports it. Breakers and fusible switches for obsolete lines can carry long lead times, which turns an outage into a shutdown. The permit record does not confirm this; an on-site inspection is required.

• Era-based check

  NFPA 70E expects arc-flash studies to be reviewed at least every five years, or after any change to the service. Buildings this age often have labeling that no longer matches the installed gear. The permit record does not confirm this; an on-site inspection is required.

Most recent permit on record for this parcel: 2026-02-19 (TZ-PMT-0226-00016) — **VOID** This project is for starting my beverage/food stand. I am working to follow all health and safety regulations and complete the required steps to get my business up and running..

Permit history (23)

How to read the status column: Final / Complete / C of O — city records show the permit was finalized. Issued — the work was permitted, but final completion is not confirmed. Applied / In review / Approved / Fees paid — proposed, not completion. Expired — the permit expired without a confirmed final status. Void / Withdrawn / Canceled — not evidence the work was installed. Any other status is shown exactly as the issuing office records it, without a completion reading.

Record numbers link to the City of Tucson’s official file. Highlighted rows are the ones that imply electrical work or an unpermitted-work finding.

This is an inference from public records — the year a structure was built, how it is classified, and what has been permitted. It is not an inspection, and nothing here confirms what is actually installed at this address. The only way to know is to look in the panel. See an error in this public-record report? Report a correction · About this data.

The contractor’s read is a plain-English brief of the record above, written by AI — what it shows across electrical, mechanical and the building itself, what is missing for the era, and what to verify on site.