Electrical permit history — 8550 E Old Spanish Tr

8550 E Old Spanish Tr, Tucson — built 1971, with 10 permits on record. Review electrical, HVAC and remodel history with links to official records.

Multifamily property

8550 E Old Spanish Tr

Built 1971 — 1970s multifamily stock · 10 permits on record; no permitted panel/service or HVAC work among them

Parcel
134090090
Built
1971 (county record)
Jurisdiction
Tucson
Zoning
R-3
Assessor use
Apartments 25 - 99 Units 2 Story
Parcel size
1.83 acres
Building area
44,218 sq ft (assessor record)
Sewer
Connection on file (1971) (county sewer connection records)
Flood zone
X — minimal flood hazard (FEMA)
Historic preservation
Not on file (City of Tucson HP layers)

See the property

County aerial photograph centered on 8550 E Old Spanish Tr, parcel outlined

Pima County orthophoto (Pictometry 2024 / PAG 2023 / NAIP 2023 mosaic) — parcel outlined in yellow. Aerials can predate recent work and show nothing about what is inside; context, not evidence.

Is it time to upgrade?

  • Electrical service & distributionNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. That does not mean the gear is original — only that nothing has been permitted here recently. Where it matters is capacity: obsolete distribution lines carry breaker and fusible-switch lead times that turn an outage into a shutdown, and that is worth knowing before a new tenant or a new rooftop unit. Separately from replacement: NFPA 70E expects the arc-flash study to be reviewed at least every five years, or after any change to the service.
  • Heating, cooling & mechanicalNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Packaged rooftop units work harder in Tucson than almost anywhere, so 12 to 15 years is a realistic service life rather than the 15 to 20 the industry quotes. Worth confirming from the equipment nameplate rather than the record. Replacing a rooftop unit is also an electrical question: the new unit's minimum circuit ampacity and its disconnect often differ from the old one.
  • Fire alarm & life safetyNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Any alarm or sprinkler work here predates this feed. For an occupied commercial building that is worth confirming from the panel and the inspection tags rather than assuming.
  • RoofNot in this windowNothing in the permit records we read for this parcel that names this system. Roof age matters electrically too: it sets what can be penetrated for new rooftop units, conduit, or solar.

A found permit means a lot. A missing one means less. We read the City of Tucson’s own permit file, not a recent extract of it — back to about 2006, and into the 1990s on properties with that much history. Microfiche before then was never fully digitised. Every record links to the city’s official file. A blank line does not say nothing was done: work gets done without permits all the time. The only way to know what is actually installed is to look at it.

What that usually means electrically

  • Era-based check — high priority

    Distribution gear this age is frequently past the point where the manufacturer still supports it. Breakers and fusible switches for obsolete lines can carry long lead times, which turns an outage into a shutdown. The permit record does not confirm this; an on-site inspection is required.

  • Worth confirming

    Multifamily property. House panels, unit meters, and common-area loads are usually metered and maintained separately — worth confirming which side of the meter a problem falls on before scheduling work.

  • Era-based check

    NFPA 70E expects arc-flash studies to be reviewed at least every five years, or after any change to the service. Buildings this age often have labeling that no longer matches the installed gear. The permit record does not confirm this; an on-site inspection is required.

Recorded sales (4)

Recorded transfers from the Pima County Assessor — 4 of 4
DatePriceType
2020-03-25$4,060,000Warranty Deed
2017-09-15$2,980,000Warranty Deed
2016-03-17$1,550,000Warranty Deed
2002-03-20$1,412,500Special Warranty Deed

Recorded sales are the sales the Pima County Assessor has on file from affidavits of property value — not every transfer, not listings, and not a valuation. Parties are never shown here. A sale with no permitted electrical work since is worth knowing before the next sale or a remodel.

Most recent permit on record for this parcel: 2016-06-30 (T16OT00810) — 1- NON ILLUM DF MONU.

Permit history (10)

Permit history for this parcel — 8 of 10 records
DateRecordWhatStatusValue
2016-06-30expired 2017-01-04T16OT00810City permit recordSIGN1- NON ILLUM DF MONUExpired
2011-11-01expired 2012-05-01T11OT02049City permit recordSIGN45 DAY BANNER-8/26/11 TO 10/9/11Expired
2011-05-20finaledT11OT01011City permit recordSIGN90 DAY BANNER; 05/27/11 - 08/25/11Final
2011-02-25finaledT11OT00383City permit recordSIGN90 DAY BANNER START: 02/25/11 END: 05/26/11Final
2010-11-05finaledT10OT02404City permit recordSIGN90 DAY BANNER START: 11/08/10 END: 02/06/11Final
2010-08-10finaledT10OT01699City permit recordSIGN18735Final
2010-05-07finaledT10OT01009City permit recordSIGN18329Final
2010-02-04finaledT10OT00281City permit recordSIGN17881Final
Show 2 older records
Permit history for this parcel — remaining 2 records
DateRecordWhatStatusValue
2009-12-04expired 2010-07-19T09OT02613City permit recordSIGN17586Closed
2009-10-16finaledT09OT02226City permit recordSIGN17364Final

How to read the status column: Final / Complete / C of O — city records show the permit was finalized. Issued — the work was permitted, but final completion is not confirmed. Applied / In review / Approved / Fees paid — proposed, not completion. Expired — the permit expired without a confirmed final status. Void / Withdrawn / Canceled — not evidence the work was installed. Any other status is shown exactly as the issuing office records it, without a completion reading.

Code enforcement (32)

Code cases and housing-code violations recorded against this parcel, by category. Closed cases stay on the record, and most of these are closed — check the status column. We show the category and the official record number rather than the complaint text, which often names people who have nothing to do with the property.

Code enforcement history for this parcel — 8 of 32 records
DateRecordWhatStatus
2023-07-13CE-VIO0723-04520Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseClosed - unfounded
2022-08-15T22DV04718Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseClosed - resolved
2021-07-14T21DV04433Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2021-05-10T21DV02756Code enforcement caseRefuseComplian
2020-05-07T20DV03136Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseNoverify
2019-10-28T19DV08468Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseNoverify
2019-10-15T19DV08182Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseNoverify
2018-05-30T18DV03033Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
Show 24 older records
Code enforcement history for this parcel — remaining 24 records
DateRecordWhatStatus
2017-09-11T17DV04434Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2017-04-24T17DV01684Code enforcement caseRefuseReferred
2015-12-17T15DV09713Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseNoverify
2015-12-10T15DV09535Code enforcement caseElectricalComplian
2015-10-02T15DV07373Code enforcement caseRefuseComplian
2015-09-02T15DV06453Code enforcement caseRefuseNoverify
2014-10-15T14DV08623Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseNoverify
2012-01-13T12DV00283Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2009-04-14T09DV01978Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseCourtcmp
2007-08-13T07DV07582Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2007-04-17T07DV03380Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseInvalid
2007-03-09T07DV02197Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseVoid
2006-12-04T06DV02689Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2006-08-24T06DV01142Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2006-05-30T06FR01568Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseField
2006-04-14T06DV00426Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2006-01-05T06FR00004Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseField
2003-10-06T03DV00964Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2002-10-16T02VL02106Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2002-09-23T02VL01879Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
2001-06-05T01VL01502Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseClosed
2000-10-18T00VL01491Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseComplian
1998-12-23T98VL01494Code enforcement caseSignComplian
1998-06-22T98VL00192Code enforcement caseCode enforcement caseClosed

Record numbers link to the City of Tucson’s official file. Highlighted rows are the ones that imply electrical work or an unpermitted-work finding.

This is an inference from public records — the year a structure was built, how it is classified, and what has been permitted. It is not an inspection, and nothing here confirms what is actually installed at this address. The only way to know is to look in the panel.

What describes you?
Call (520) 308-6235

The contractor’s read is a plain-English brief of the record above, written by AI — what it shows across electrical, mechanical and the building itself, what is missing for the era, and what to verify on site.

How this report was built

This is a reading of public records for parcel 134090090 — 10 permits on file from 2009 to 2016 (10 sign) and 32 code enforcement cases — assembled from the Pima County parcel file, the City of Tucson’s Property Research Online file (permits back to about 2006, further on some parcels), and the City’s GIS permit and code-enforcement layers (2022 onward). Public records last checked 2026-08-16; the record is re-read at least weekly. Each permit and code case links to its official file. The verdicts are inferences from what was permitted and when, and from the era the building went up; they are not an inspection, and nothing here confirms what is installed. A permit that is present is strong evidence; a permit that is absent is weak evidence — plenty of work is never permitted, and older county records were only partly moved online.

The interactive version of this report can also read the plan sheets behind a City of Tucson permit and write a contractor’s brief of the whole record — those buttons appear once the page finishes loading. Written and maintained by Arizona Electrical Solutions, LLC, a licensed Tucson contractor (ROC 276948 CR-11 electrical, ROC 326401 CR-39 HVAC, ROC 329360 KB-1, ROC 312437 KA).

Look up a different address: Tucson permit history & electrical upgrade check · see permit data by neighborhood.